Writing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Satire: chain mail CV) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Satire== | ==Satire== | ||
* [[chain mail CV]] | |||
* These are somewhat dated, having been written during the Bush II administration: | * These are somewhat dated, having been written during the Bush II administration: | ||
** [[Leviticus Helms]]: a proposed radio serial | ** [[Leviticus Helms]]: a proposed radio serial | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
** [[How to Argue with a Liberal]] | ** [[How to Argue with a Liberal]] | ||
''There's also some musical satire in the {{lc|satire}} category.'' | ''There's also some musical satire in the {{lc|satire}} category.'' | ||
==Silliness== | ==Silliness== | ||
* '''1989ish''' [[Me/geek filk exchange]] | * '''1989ish''' [[Me/geek filk exchange]] |
Revision as of 13:25, 8 December 2019
Most of my writing is either political or personal, since that seems to be all I know how to talk about. I'm trying to expand that range, but there's a learning curve.
Personal
- Emoblog
- Me/138 Governor Street: a place I lived from 1985-1987
- Me/The Great Trailer Fiasco: a thing that happened in 2002-3
- Offsite: writings about Jenny (on the HypertWiki): ~1979-1984 (Who is Jenny?)
- /2004 gender writings
- /embarrassing moments
Fiction
- Open-Source Universes: meta
- The Beatriffics: unfinished fake band bio (2011)
- From the Desk of B6: a correspondence short-short (c.1989)
- /drafts: a place for exploring ideas to see what they turn into
Satire
- chain mail CV
- These are somewhat dated, having been written during the Bush II administration:
- Leviticus Helms: a proposed radio serial
- Stand Up to Your Rights
- How to Argue with a Liberal
There's also some musical satire in the satire category.
Silliness
- 1989ish Me/geek filk exchange
Meta-political
- 2017-02-27 (offsite: Reddit) When epistemic systems gain social and political significance: apparently Morbius thought this made some good points
- 2009-05-25 Demonizing in the Dark