Talk:How to Argue with a Liberal/anti-GW: Difference between revisions

From Woozalia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I didn't want to delete the original poster's satire, but felt that it's humor was based on certain assumptions about conservatives that while often true are not underpinnings of our philo...)
 
(response)
Line 1: Line 1:
I didn't want to delete the original poster's satire, but felt that it's humor was based on certain assumptions about conservatives that while often true are not underpinnings of our philosophy.  Asking the pope about abortion: funny.  The liberal mind requiring facts: funny, but probably not in the way the author intended.
I didn't want to delete the original poster's satire, but felt that it's humor was based on certain assumptions about conservatives that while often true are not underpinnings of our philosophy.  Asking the pope about abortion: funny.  The liberal mind requiring facts: funny, but probably not in the way the author intended.
: That's fine -- I want to do some fact-checking (ha!) to make sure my satire is on target, and then I may have some further comments for you... the tone of what you wrote seems to fit, so I'll use it if I can :-) It would probably be better to discuss the global warming question over at Issuepedia: [[issue:global warming|global warming]] | [[issue:arguments against global warming|arguments against global warming]] | [[issue:global warming denial|global warming denial]] | [[issue:global warming hysteria|global warming hysteria]] | or even [[issue:American conservatism|American conservatism]] - feel free to comment on the talk page for any article that inspires you ;-) --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 18:01, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 23:01, 12 December 2008

I didn't want to delete the original poster's satire, but felt that it's humor was based on certain assumptions about conservatives that while often true are not underpinnings of our philosophy. Asking the pope about abortion: funny. The liberal mind requiring facts: funny, but probably not in the way the author intended.

That's fine -- I want to do some fact-checking (ha!) to make sure my satire is on target, and then I may have some further comments for you... the tone of what you wrote seems to fit, so I'll use it if I can :-) It would probably be better to discuss the global warming question over at Issuepedia: global warming | arguments against global warming | global warming denial | global warming hysteria | or even American conservatism - feel free to comment on the talk page for any article that inspires you ;-) --Woozle 18:01, 12 December 2008 (EST)