Talk:How to Argue with a Liberal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Talk:How to Argue with a Liberal moved to Talk:How to Argue with a Liberal/anti-GW: the thrust of the insertions has become clear, and it's not about writing good satire) |
(comment about repostings of this piece) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The discussion about the insertions added by the anonymous user at {{anonuser|76.208.33.224}} has been moved to the following pages: | |||
* [[/anti-GW]] for the [[issue:global warming denial|global warming denial]]ist satire attempt | |||
* [[/anti-liberal]] for the remaining issues raised satirically | |||
I have to be amused, though -- it looks like this article has been posted to at least two (possibly three) forums by people who totally didn't get that it was satirical (and who in one case thought they were copying it from Wikipedia). Only in one case was there any follow-up, and while the follower-up didn't get that it was satire, they at least saw the implications: "This seems to be an argument against thought." and "What, Lol? How horrible that someone might want... evidence." I've saved the pages (currently only available via cache) and must repost in full at some point... --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 20:42, 18 December 2008 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:42, 19 December 2008
The discussion about the insertions added by the anonymous user at 76.208.33.224 has been moved to the following pages:
- /anti-GW for the global warming denialist satire attempt
- /anti-liberal for the remaining issues raised satirically
I have to be amused, though -- it looks like this article has been posted to at least two (possibly three) forums by people who totally didn't get that it was satirical (and who in one case thought they were copying it from Wikipedia). Only in one case was there any follow-up, and while the follower-up didn't get that it was satire, they at least saw the implications: "This seems to be an argument against thought." and "What, Lol? How horrible that someone might want... evidence." I've saved the pages (currently only available via cache) and must repost in full at some point... --Woozle 20:42, 18 December 2008 (EST)